top of page

CARE/Threat
Team Training

Module 1:

BIT & CARE overview


Module 2:

Review three cases & documentation

cccs_logo_big_png.png
Depositphotos_273065184_XL.jpg

This email is not recognized. Please use your school assigned email address.

If you still cannot gain access, please contact your administrator or info@interactt.org.

topAnchor
preAnchor

Pre-Test

Choose the single best answer on multiple choice questions.

Complete the pre-test to access the Zoom link for the morning session

1. There is a culturally competent, research-based profile of a school shooter that should guide the team in the assessment of the risk and protective factors.
2. When documenting a case, all the following are true except:
3. Ideally, teams have a diverse make up and a balance between “boots on the ground” and those with the power to take meaningful action.
4. A central component of a CARE, BIT or threat team is managing a case as it comes up in a timely manner and meeting as needed to manage problems that occur on campus in an efficacious and consistent manner.
5. Who should be on a BIT/CARE or threat team?
6. Team diversity includes:
7. Because teams manage sensitive information, it is advisable to not advertise or market the team to better protect privileged student information.
8. The three core functions of a team include:
9. Team leadership is ideally one person overseeing weekly meetings and managing short- and long-term team goals.
10. Set a high threshold for interventions as law enforcement and SROs should be used in a limited fashion for serious, life-threatening safety concerns.
Submit

Please answer all questions.

Complete the pre-test to access the Zoom link for the morning session

Module 1: BIT and CARE Overview

Continue

Please watch the video before you continue

mod1Anchor

Case Studies

Case One
Case Two
Case Three

Case One: Curtis

Curtis is in the 5th grade and likes to play Fortnite, Call of Duty and Battlefield. He talks about these games with other students, discussing weapons, explosives, and tactics. A teacher observes Curtis drawing a technical map with “kill zones.” This goes around the school quickly and parents begin to express concern by calling the front office about a “student drawing a hit list and a map of the school.” Several weeks ago, two students were killed in a school shooting in a town about 100 miles from your school.

Case 2 Pic 3.png

  1. What are some of the general concerns with this case? Identify all the stakeholders.

  2. If the school conducts a threat assessment, what risk factors would you focus on assessing? Would you describe this threat as transient or substantive? Would you lean toward affective or targeted violence?

  3. How quickly should this situation be addressed (e.g., minutes/hours, within the day, within the next several days, within the week)?

  4. What risk factors would you assess for with Curtis?

  5. What protective factors?

  6. What are some of the potential biases or pressures that may rush the team to an inaccurate assessment or process?

  7. Who is best to conduct the behavioral threat assessment? How is this different from a psychological assessment?

  8. What are some of the services or resources needed for Curtis?

  9. Who is the best on your team to talk with the parents? Discuss three key talking points you may share.

Continue
caseAnchor

Module 2: Case Study Review

These sessions begin at 1:45 ET.

Click the shape or the button below it to access the Zoom for the afternoon.

District, Upland & Aston
East Campus Teams
West Campus Teams
Thanks for submitting!

District Team:

  • Mark Battinieri

  • Raeleen Derham

  • Bob Forrester

  • Kim Nickels

  • Timika Mills

  • Judy Ryan

  • Janelle Trigg

  • Sharon Watkins

 

Upland Campus:

  • Durand Adams

  • Dan Babiak

  • Nicole Codagone

  • Christine Reid

  • Eric Sotsky

 

Aston Campus:

  • Alexis Blanden

  • Joseph Cuff-Wright

  • Kim Heffner

  • Caryn Jackson

  • Juanita Jenkins

  • Phil Meitner

  • Nicole Patterson

  • Bill Pettyjohn

  • Kelly Pugh

  • Katherine Shilenok-Wright

  • Shauna Whitehead

  • Dontae Wilson

  • Chrisann Wroten

  • Larry Yarbray

East A:

  • Stacey Babiak

  • Julianne Cull

  • Ray’ven Gordon

  • Brittany Jaffe

  • Jessica Reynolds

  • Rushelle Roberts

  • Bernice Sudler

 

East B:

  • Rene Anderson

  • Carla D’Angelo

  • Michelle Holmes

  • Sharia Mapp

  • Eric Pugh

  • Roheem Roten

 

East C:

  • Nancy Bratton

  • Amanda Chavez

  • Lauren Depue

  • Jamie Friedman

  • Lauren Hoot

  • Stephen Walker

  • Anne Marie Ward

  • Nancy Ward

 

East D:

  • Marcus Johnson

  • Sarah Klishevich

  • Samuel Lannetti

  • Ann McCullough

  • Jon Munn

  • Nancy Quinn

  • Lauren Tumolo

  • Janay Winston

  • Danielle Wijtyk

West A:

  • Kelly Chambers

  • Bridget Deal

  • TyQuan Dockery

  • Rosemary Marvil

  • Timothy Mullen

  • Dominique Taylor

 

West B:

  • Karen Coleman

  • LaChante Collier-Bacon

  • Jacquelin Heidin

  • Nicole Lemons

  • Hannah Sacco

  • Zane Williams

 

West C:

  • Jackie Amato

  • Eddie Boyd

  • Keisha Carter

  • Lisa Ruskay

  • Donyatta Tinson Smith

  • Angela Warfield

Continue to the Feedback Form and Post-Test
mod2Anchor

Before you proceed to the post-test, please take a moment to fill out this evaluation survey.

No identifying information will be connected to your answers, which will remain anonymous.

Please rate your overall experienceExtremely PoorPoorGoodGreatExcellentPlease rate your overall experience

1 = strongly disagree   |   2 = disagree    |    3 = neutral     |     4 = agree   |    5 = strongly agree  

The information was presented in an effective manner.

The instructor(s) demonstrated expert knowledge.

The instructor(s) was/were engaging.

The overall training was satisfactory.

The training increased my knowledge in the subject area.

The training materials were helpful and sufficient.

I would recommend this training to others

Thank you!

surveyAnchor

Post-Test

Choose the single best answer on multiple choice questions.

1. When documenting a case, all the following are true except:
2. Because teams manage sensitive information, it is advisable to not advertise or market the team to better protect privileged student information.
3. Team leadership is ideally one person overseeing weekly meetings and managing short- and long-term team goals.
4. Who should be on a BIT/CARE or threat team?
5. There is a culturally competent, research-based profile of a school shooter that should guide the team in the assessment of the risk and protective factors.
6. Team diversity includes:
7. A central component of a CARE, BIT or threat team is managing a case as it comes up in a timely manner and meeting as needed to manage problems that occur on campus in an efficacious and consistent manner.
8. The three core functions of a team include:
9. Set a high threshold for interventions as law enforcement and SROs should be used in a limited fashion for serious, life-threatening safety concerns.
10. Ideally, teams have a diverse make up and a balance between “boots on the ground” and those with the power to take meaningful action.
Submit

Please answer all questions.

postAnchor
redoAnchor

Your score was below the 80% required for course completion.

Please review the materials and re-take the test.

Re-Take the Post Test

Congratulations on completing the BIT/Threat Team Training course.

​

Please confirm you name for the certificate. You will receive your certificate of completion by email within 48 hours.

Submit

Thank you.

Download Certificate of Competion
certAnchor

Congratulations on completing the BIT/Threat Team Training course.

​

Please enter you name here.

You will receive a certificate of completion within two business days.
If you have questions or do not receive your certificate, email info@interactt.org

ThankYou!

bottom of page